Postal Service: No More Saturday Mail Delivery by Aug. 1

The U.S. Postal Service announced it will end Saturday mail delivery by Aug. 1. Speak out: How will this affect you?

Calling the six-days-per-week mail delivery business model “no longer sustainable,” the U.S. Postal Service announced Wednesday it will eliminate Saturday delivery of mail by Aug. 1.

The plan to change delivery from six days a week to five would only affect first-class mail. Packages, mail-order medicines, priority and express mail would still be delivered on Saturdays, and local post offices will remain open for business Saturdays.

According to the U.S. Postal Service, the reasons are continued economic struggles and the increasing use of the Internet for communications and bill paying by consumers. The U.S. Postal Service is also the only federal agency required to pre-fund health benefits for retirees, and those costs are escalating quickly.

“Our current business model of delivering mail six days a week is no longer sustainable. We must change in order to remain an integral part of the American community for decades to come.”

Saturday is the lightest mail delivery day by volume and many businesses are closed on Saturdays, according to the U.S. Postal Service. But many residents receive print magazines and ads on Saturdays in the mail that may be shifted to another day.

A Rasmussen poll on mail delivery in 2012 showed “Three-out-of-four Americans (75%) would prefer the U.S. Postal Service cut mail delivery to five days a week rather than receive government subsidies to cover ongoing losses.”

A USA Today/Gallup poll in 2010 found the majority of U.S. residents surveyed were ok with eliminating Saturday delivery. The March 2010 telephone survey of 999 adults revealed people age 55 and older were more likely than younger people to have used the mail to pay a bill or send a letter in the past two weeks.

Speak out: How will this change affect you? Will you miss getting mail on Saturdays?

Brandon February 07, 2013 at 03:43 PM
The USPS is not a government business though. http://faq.usps.com/eCustomer/iq/usps/request.do?create=kb:USPSFAQ&view()=c%5Bc_usps020310a%5D&varset(source)=sourceType:embedded Since they would be cutting a day out, I would expect a 1/6 pay cut and 1/6 pension cut to go along with the changes.
Gayle M. Montgomery February 08, 2013 at 06:51 PM
B K, the irony of having a post office box, is that I'm really asking the post office not to deliver mail at my home. Just walk a few feet and stick it in a little box right there in their office. To me, that's less work.
Gayle M. Montgomery February 08, 2013 at 06:53 PM
Robert, anecdotally, I have recently learned that one of my ancestral grandfathers, Sir William Keith, who was appointed by the King to be the Lt. Gov. under William Penn, helped to send a 15-year old printer's apprentice he befriended, one young Master Franklin, to England. Kind of exciting to learn.
spidra February 09, 2013 at 03:31 AM
It's the 2006 Congressional mandate to pre-pay for health benefits for *future* retirees that has caused fiscal issues. Were it not for that mandate, USPS is several million dollars in the black. This isn't mentioned enough in reportage. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/five-things/the-u-s-postal-service/11433/ Like postal services in all countries with great Internet penetration, USPS has had its business cut into. And needs to make changes to deal with that changing landscape. But it is not losing money at the rate some would have us believe. It was this Congressional mandate that caused the problem. A mandate that affects no other government agency and a standard to which the private sector isn't held, either. http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/congresss_war_on_the_post_office/
not Carl Peterson lll February 10, 2013 at 04:53 AM
Spidra, I heard that on FOX news this morning. It was the first time I heard about the pre-pay thing. But on further reading, I am wondering if that is also just one piece of the puzzle.They are independant, however they took a "loan from the gov of 12.1 billion dollars, which is technically a loss on the balance sheet. Also The "pre-pay" for retirement. I would bet that means they need to simply fund the reirement accounts to the level they should have already been to remain solvent in the future, without a bail-out. As with most cities, and states, (California) the projections for returns on retirement savings were unrealistic, and need much more money. Postal workers do work for their money, however I never understood how the idea of full retirement pay after 30 years is a good idea.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »