Eminent Domain is For The Public Use

Mayor Doug Tessitor discusses the concept of Eminent Domain and fair compensation in order to create something for the public use.

“This may sound like a dumb question, but can you explain to me how eminent domain is legal? Whenever it's explained to me, it just sounds like the government taking advantage of a citizen's rights."

Great question!  I’ll try to answer briefly a question that has been the subject of books.

The first legal foundation is found in the U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment:  “…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”  Two concepts are evident here; first, the taking of private property for a “public use” and second, the requirement for “just compensation.”  The second legal foundation in California is found in Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution.  This constitutional provision also allows for government condemnation of private property for “public purposes” and requires “just compensation.”

Controversies arise over what constitutes a public use and, of course, what “just compensation” is.

The most questionable acts of eminent domain occur when private property is condemned for purposes of generating new economic activity.  For example, condemning a private farm and then selling the land to a shopping center developer.  The farmer is deprived of his farming activities and the developer profits from his real estate activities.  Assuming “just compensation” was paid, where is the public purpose?  And why should the farmer be disadvantaged in favor of the developer? 

In a land that values private property, individual rights and equality, it is easy to see why the transaction described above raises significant questions.  This type of transaction is too complex to discuss here.

There are other examples of eminent domain that are clearer: transactions that serve public purposes and seek to benefit society as a whole.

And, as important, those transactions that do not place individual rights at a significant disadvantage.

The current Gold Line proposed condemnation of property for the Maintenance and Operations  (M&O) Facility in Monrovia is such a case.

The public purpose is clear.

Traffic congestion on the 210 Freeway, environmental issues and affordable transportation are among the rationales for construction of a light rail system.

The right-of-way for the entire extension is already owned by the Gold Line and follows the existing freight tracks to San Bernardino County.

L.A. Metro, the agency that is charged with operating  the regional light rail system, has mandated the building of an M&O facility that will not only serve the Gold Line but will also serve a regional light rail system.

The chosen location is the closest possible site to the rest of L.A. County’s system.  Again, the public purpose is indisputable.

Now we come to the issue of, “just compensation.”  Half of the 28 acres required for the Gold Line are owned by the Monrovia Redevelopment Agency and it is a willing seller at a negotiated price.

Other property owners have also agreed to sell at negotiated prices. 

One property owner has insisted on a price that is four times the appraised value of his property.  It is this property owner that has caused the “resolution of necessity,” which is the first step in the condemnation process. 

Our laws allow for taking of property for “public purposes” and require the payment of, “just compensation”.  This means not only paying a fair price for the property, but also paying relocation costs; it does not mean paying an exorbitant price for the acquisition.

Fair compensation is the aspect of eminent domain that is least talked about and is the least recognized component of the process.  “Compensation” is a given; “Fair” is the critical word and it must be fair to all parties – including, if not especially, the taxpayers!

Christina August 16, 2011 at 02:10 AM
I would even be willing to take of it! if we had more people wilingl t o do a little extra in our own areas it would go along way. If only more people would take pride in our city, I now longer call it a town because it lost that lovely feel..I've lived here over 30 years. I feel that we can no longer call it the "Pride of the Foothills"
Christina August 16, 2011 at 02:15 AM
Good comment Janelle..very good point about the cost..but responding is one thing but positive action is another,, hopefully that will happen sometime soon..
Christina August 16, 2011 at 02:15 AM
Good comment Janelle..very good point about the cost..but responding is one thing but positive action is another,, hopefully that will happen sometime soon..
Steven Hanson August 16, 2011 at 02:26 AM
I also have a fountain on my property and a sizable waterfall and pond it drains into. My water bill is not high at all and the maintenance is nil. I only change pumps about once every two years...that's it. I think the toilets, swimming pools, showers, baths,etc in Glendora drain the water supply much more than a public fountain would. Talk to the owners of T.Phillips and ask what it takes to operate the one outside their establishment. I doubt that it's very much. Like Christina, I would be happy to help with maintenance of that area. If you haven't been to Rancho Cucamonga...check it out...many public areas have cutting-edge landscaping, fountains, sculpture,etc. It's really striking and inviting!
Kathy Bell August 17, 2011 at 05:36 PM
The business owners in the Village, whether all of them want to or not, are all paying to be in the BID. That money could be used to help maintain a much needed and nicer "Transit Plaza". The thousands of dollars that was wasted sending out late postcards for the chili event in the Village last year could have helped maintain this area several times over, instead the notice was received by everyone I talked to the afternoon of the event, after it had been going on for several hours. If those notices had been sent out one or two weeks earlier there could have been even more people at that event, generating more customers for those buisnesses. Talk about sterile, it's to bad the Diamond Ridge area isn't more appealing, a few trees, places to sit, a fountain, etc. would make it a much nicer area also. Those businesses all seem to be doing very well, they could all chip in the extra dollars to beautify that area at least a little. But that is just my opinion. On another note, I would like to thank the city. This is the very first Summer that I have not seen water being wasted by the city. Every past Summer you could drive around town and see public green areas being watered during the day, and water running down the streets. A huge high five to whoever is on top of this!!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »