Get the Word Out: Teachers Are Paid Well

Columnist Kathy Hernandez opines that if people knew hard numbers for how well teachers are actually paid, the profession would attract more candidates, because they could then regard teaching as an economically prudent choice.

Did you know that people in the private sector with comparable SAT and GRE scores to teachers are paid less? The recent NY Times Room for Debate feature titled, “Are Teachers Overpaid?” asked whether this means that teachers are overpaid or if public schools should pay more to attract top applicants.

I propose a third solution: let people know how much teachers are paid, so they can regard teaching as an economically prudent choice.

The prevailing consensus in this country is that teachers are underpaid. This is why hardly any of my college classmates considered a career in teaching. Fortunately, it’s not true, and there are numbers to prove it.

The Sacramento Bee recently published a tool called, “See how well your district pays its teachers, superintendent.” It allows you to search an online database by California region, county and school district to see average teacher salaries. When you combine that with the NY Times “What percent are you?“ tool, which allows you to see what percentile an income represents for a given geographic region, it becomes clear that teacher salaries are well within the top half for our state.

The chart below shows where teacher salaries for some California districts place teachers compared to all households. I’ve included two columns for the percentiles, since many households have dual incomes. For rough comparison purposes, I’m doubling the teacher salary to be the household income. I know some teachers who are sole wage earners, and some who are married to people who make quite a bit more than they do, so this is just a rough estimate.

District Average
Percentile if
Household Income
is Twice as High Local: La Cañada Unified $70,964 Los Angeles Top 39% Top 13% Pasadena Unified $65,714 Los Angeles Top 43% Top 15% South Pasadena Unified $74,956 Los Angeles Top 37% Top 12% San Marino $70,574 Los Angeles Top 40% Top 13% Los Angeles Unified $67,084 Los Angeles Top 41% Top 15% Glendale Unified $70,145 Los Angeles Top 40% Top 13% Arcadia $79,664 Los Angeles Top 34% Top 10% Monrovia Unified $70,287 Los Angeles Top 40% Top 13% Baldwin Park Unified $75,020 Los Angeles Top 37% Top 12% Glendora Unified $74,056 Los Angeles Top 37% Top 12% Highest paying school districts in California: Montecito Union Elementary $101,066 Santa Barbara Top 27% Top 7% Mountain View-Los Altos Union $100,530 Santa Clara Top 40% Top 14%

Bear in mind that these figures do not reflect that teachers enjoy far more vacation than most workers and get far more generous benefits than most private sector employees.

I don’t believe that teachers should be paid any less. Children are our future, and we need to value the people who teach them. However, we also need to be sure that our teachers are of the highest caliber.

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel recently gave figures showing the vast difference in caliber between people entering the teaching profession in Finland compared to those who enter in the U.S.:

"At the University of Helsinki, a mere 6.7% of those who applied to be primary school teachers were admitted this year to the education school.

That’s a lower acceptance rate than the 10% of applicants admitted to the University of Helsinki’s schools of law and medicine.

By comparison, the School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee accepted 96% of undergraduate students who applied for the 2011 year, and 88% of post-baccalaureate applicants.''

Perhaps if people realized how well teachers are paid, more higher-qualified applicants, particularly those in the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and math) would enter the profession.

Kathy Hernandez' column first appeared on her blog, KCH Blog, which you may read here.

About this column: A La Cañada mom, serial volunteer and social media whiz offers tips and opinions about current news and trends.

Daniel January 25, 2012 at 05:09 PM
I think this is unfair to teachers who deal with larger and larger class sizes. Parents. They spend hours on class prep. Often provide their own supplies. These are highly educated professionals with advanced degrees, and at least compensated with a near living wage. Theres lots to consider. I don't think they are paid enough. Teachers spend lots of time molding are children. I am grateful. Thank you teachers for all you do.
Joseph Probst January 25, 2012 at 05:29 PM
A couple of points the author did not consider: 1. Most of the school districts in this area have a decrease in enrollment. Having less students leads to teachers being laid off. The junior teachers who earn less are the ones that must be laid off first. This now leads us with the senior teachers who earn more. The average salary is now pushed up due to student loss. 2. Due to student loss districts are laying off teachers not hiring. There are no jobs for new teachers. We will have a major teacher shortage in just a few years. If you look at other public servants and the amount of education it takes to be a teacher the average pay should be up towards $100,000.
Wayne Tennille January 25, 2012 at 09:30 PM
Interesting how this "social media whiz" stitches together these "facts" that support her point of view, sprinkles in some unwarranted assumptions, and somehow thinks she has reached a logical conclusion. Stick to your social media skills Kathy!
Yolanda Mckay January 25, 2012 at 09:34 PM
So do those average salaries include only in the classroom teachers, or are administrative and specialists salaries included, because i know lots of teachers who make half of what is on the scale, and charter school teachers that make less than $30,000 per year.
Colleen January 26, 2012 at 08:40 PM
I know teachers who make more than they deserve because they aren't doing a good job as they hide behind a book and dish out 'packets' for the kids to learn from. There are also wonderful teachers who don't make enough and eat sleep and breath their students and can't sleep if one is falling behind.. that part seems to be a lost art thanks to what the entire gov't is doing to the entire school systems everywhere. There are those that suck at teaching but are protected by tenure. There is an ex teacher, good friend of mine who is now a principal of the alternative HS in Glendora.. I'd pay her ungodly amounts of money if it were up to me b/c she sincerely loves every one of those students and will fight for their rights and their education... you don't find alot of teachers like that anymore. there are quite a few, my kids have each been very lucky and had great teachers.. but we've also come across those who are just adult bodies in the class and the kids don't pick much up.. it's a hard job, I wouldn't want it.. but if you're going to do it, do it and do it right..
Albert G January 26, 2012 at 09:08 PM
Good teachers are a true crap shoot. A district might hire a good one. They might not. It all depends on the personality of the person hired, how motivated they are, how willing they are to give of themselves and how much they value kids and education., A person can get through a teaching credential program without any of those qualities just as an attorney, doctor or police officer can get through their training without the qualities that will ensure their success. Sadly, most teacher training programs are inadequate and never fully prepare candidates for what they will encounter in a school or classroom. When training becomes more comprehensive and the less committed ones are weeded out, we will have better teachers. It really isn't all about how much money they are offered.
Yolanda Mckay January 26, 2012 at 09:49 PM
Still, no one has answered if these statistics include administrative salaries and specialist salaries, or are these the actual averages of the teacher that is in the classroom every day, the average teacher?
Wayne Tennille January 26, 2012 at 10:03 PM
As a teacher myself, I hoped to receive a modest income that would provide for my family, put my two kids through college and let me put a few dollars away for retirement. Of course I wasn't expecting to get rich! I did constantly fight for better pay and benefits. It seems that the Board and Management tried to get us to work for as little as possible. Most teacher salaries are a function of coursework completed and years taught in the district. A more stable and well educated teaching population will earn more than a relatively new and experienced population. Perhaps the better measure would be the median salary. If you average my income with Mitt Romney's, our average income would be higher than the average of mine and a third year teacher's. Don't be fooled by Kathy's examples. Teaching is an honorable and stable profession, but other professions pay far more for the same attained educational level. Don't do it for the money! You would be disappointed.
Wayne Tennille January 26, 2012 at 10:26 PM
Yolanda: Click on the words highlighted in blue. eg. "See how well your district pays its teachers, superintendent" that will take you to the site mentioned. At that site you will find another highlighted phrase that will take you to the Dept. Of Ed. site which explains that these are data from bargaining units. With some exceptions, these are mainly teachers but may include some specialists and resource people. Hope that helped.
Albert G January 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Solid points, Wayne...and no person who goes into teaching who believes in the honor and value of that profession expects to get rich. It's not what motivates them.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something