Don't We Want to Raise Healthy Kids?

Why is first lady Michelle Obama's "Let's Move!" campaign the target of such animosity?

"The physical and emotional health of an entire generation and the economic health and security of our nation is at stake."

Words  spoken by first lady Michelle Obama at the launch of the "Let's Move!" campaign on Feb. 9, 2010.

"Let's Move!" is the first lady's ambitious and comprehensive campaign to end childhood obesity within a generation. According to the website,  the"Let's Move!" initiative is  designed to give parents, schools and government leaders the tools they need to create and promote healthy lifestyles so that "children born today will grow up healthier and able to pursue their dreams."

Common sense would (or should) dictate that working towards a healthier future for our children is a worthy goal and that, for Michelle Obama, it is a fine use of her high-profile position.

But thinkers from the political right including 2008 Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, disagree calling Obama's plan just another way for the government to infiltrate our lives and tell us how to live them.

One of Obama's most notable detractors, Rush Limbaugh, has even gone so far as to criticize the first lady's weight, claiming that she is not fit enough to fight obesity, and scrutinizing everything she eats calling her a hypocrite' for eating ribs on a family vacation.


One might ask why this is even a political issue in the first place? And they would be right to ask the question.

Don't we want our kids to learn how to eat healthy and exercise? And aren't more tools and information --instead of less --better?

Taking statistics for what they are, which is to say, usually skewed toward the point we are trying to prove, let's examine some of the staggering numbers on childhood obesity found at www.letsmove.gov.

  • Over the past three decades, childhood obesity rates in America have tripled.
  • Today, nearly one in every three children in America is overweight or obese.
  • Childhood obesity can lead to health problems such as, diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer and asthma.
  • Children and adolescents ages eight to 18 spend at least 7.5 hours a day in front of such media entertainment as television, computers, video games and hand-held electronic devices.
  • In total, American's are consuming 31 percent more calories than we were 40 years ago.

Yikes! The good news is that there is a simple fix to these disheartening numbers, although it comes at a price for some conservative thinkers. That is because it involves tuning out the distracting rhetoric of political animosity and remembering that this is not a left/right fist fight.

We are in the midst of one of the most politically charged times our generations have seen. We argue just for the sake of arguing and get so focused on being right that we forget where our focus should be...on our kids.

This fight is about our children. We are battling against the changing times when processed foods are the easier, cheaper choice. When digital media is in the immediate grasp of even our youngest kids. When a quick car ride to school or the store is more convenient than the slower pace of a walk or a bike ride.

Creating a health-focused future for generations to come is an idealistic goal and one we should all get on board with regardless of our political leanings. As parents, we should be the first lady's strongest allies as we strive toward building healthy lifestyles that will positively affect our children.

mark April 12, 2011 at 08:40 PM
"Children born today will grow up healthier and able to pursue their dreams." To that I respond, "What types of dreams can they expect living in a Socialistic Society" ??? Maybe we should reframe this as " How to Eat healthy when your Family has no Money"..... Sarcastic? yes....Truthfull... Unfortunately yes.....
Nathan Madsen April 13, 2011 at 02:24 PM
Mark, where's the socialism? Do you even know what socialism is? Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, France (depending on who's in power), are socialist countries. They have free and fair elections on a regular basis, they don't live in some kind of Orwellian nightmare. And, oh lookie here, their children aren't going to all die of Type-II diabetes! Have you seen the orca whales navigating Wal Mart in their hovarounds lately? You're right...this country has no future. We are all doomed. So the perfectly logical solution... feed all 5 year-olds Jimmy Dean pancackes on a stick at breakfast, buckets of KFC for lunch, and meat lovers pizza for dinner, 7 days a week, forever, because Obama saved the car companies. Wash it all down with three liter bottles of 98-cent soda! Freedom! First Ladies typically champion noncontroversial causes. Laura Bush pushed for libraries and literacy. Which, now that I think about it, was very nanny state and Marxist of her. You don't have to support President Obama's policies to agree that Michelle Obama is using her position for something positive, good, and useful to society. I wasn't a big fan of George W. Bush but to then take that and turn it in to a tirade against libraries would have made me sound comical. This country needs a credible "loyal opposition." Not a bunch of monkeys throwing their feces around at people and shreiking.
Julie April 13, 2011 at 05:24 PM
The problem is not coming from conservative commentators ( though some of them are prone to use overheated language and to make the most political hay they can out of this story, you betcha!). Instead the problem comes from Michelle Obama and others like her who want to make this a "fight" (worrds even the author echoes). This is because she and other progressive types cannot resist the impulse to try and craft policy around what they think is best for people. If this were really an open conversation about what is best for kids, we would not see this divide. Conservatives don't want children to be fat or unhealthy . . . but they also don't want to hand over to them a Republic looks at every social I'll and imagines that there is some kind of magical policy solution. Sometimes you just have to accept that people living in freedom will make choices that are not in their best interest or in the best interests of their children. You are free to suggest that they choose a different path . . . but when you step beyond that, you do more damage to children (because you destroy liberty) than a Lifetime of Happy Meal lunches will do. Some things are more precious, even, than health.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something